Re: Suomen ilmavoimien hävittäjä Hornetien jälkeen
Lähetetty: 30.10.2014 22:41
Jaa jo tehdyt ekan sarjan Typhoonit jäävät käyttöiältään lyhyeksi? Helposti uudessa tuotantosarjassa korjattava tehtaan moka.
Entäs f-35 "Lightning"
II?
http://defensetech.org/2014/01/29/repor ... -reliable/
Entäs softa?
http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-pentago ... ector.html
Tässä vanhan suosikkihävittäjäni Sexy Sixin foorumilla yksi setä murjaisee linkin saatteena näin:
From Military.com on-line.
More troubles for the F-35.
May be time to scrap the whole program and restart the upgraded F-15 and F-16 assembly lines.
And maybe, but not sure, the F-22 assembly lines.
Read more: http://forum.f-106deltadart.com/thread/ ... z3HeuqdSAD
18 years to develop a piece of crap airplane that already has structural defects, some catastrophic in nature, and I am not referring to the turbine blades....... First roll out Feb 06, first installed engine run Sept 06, approx. 180 days = Wonderful achievement.... And it had yet to fly!!!!! Maiden flight on 15 Dec 2006.... First engine run to first flight- approximately 90 days.. look at the F-80-The Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star was the first jet fighter used operationally by the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF).[2] Designed and built by Lockheed in 1943 and delivered just 143 days from the start of the design process, production models were flying but not ready for service by the end of World War II!!!!!!!! It only took NAA 149 days from first pencil on paper to first flight for the P-51!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And this crappy thing is falling apart with probably less than 300 hours airframe time. Don't tell me that it is a more complex and complicated aircraft. Using the level of technology available in both eras, they are on par with each other. It is based on sorry assed attitudes and Uncle Sam's supposedly deep pockets
Lisää solvauksia ketjussa:
http://forum.f-106deltadart.com/thread/4662/35-troubles
Entäs f-35 "Lightning"
II?http://defensetech.org/2014/01/29/repor ... -reliable/
Entäs softa?
http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-pentago ... ector.html
Tässä vanhan suosikkihävittäjäni Sexy Sixin foorumilla yksi setä murjaisee linkin saatteena näin:
From Military.com on-line.
More troubles for the F-35.
May be time to scrap the whole program and restart the upgraded F-15 and F-16 assembly lines.
And maybe, but not sure, the F-22 assembly lines.
Read more: http://forum.f-106deltadart.com/thread/ ... z3HeuqdSAD
18 years to develop a piece of crap airplane that already has structural defects, some catastrophic in nature, and I am not referring to the turbine blades....... First roll out Feb 06, first installed engine run Sept 06, approx. 180 days = Wonderful achievement.... And it had yet to fly!!!!! Maiden flight on 15 Dec 2006.... First engine run to first flight- approximately 90 days.. look at the F-80-The Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star was the first jet fighter used operationally by the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF).[2] Designed and built by Lockheed in 1943 and delivered just 143 days from the start of the design process, production models were flying but not ready for service by the end of World War II!!!!!!!! It only took NAA 149 days from first pencil on paper to first flight for the P-51!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And this crappy thing is falling apart with probably less than 300 hours airframe time. Don't tell me that it is a more complex and complicated aircraft. Using the level of technology available in both eras, they are on par with each other. It is based on sorry assed attitudes and Uncle Sam's supposedly deep pockets
Lisää solvauksia ketjussa:
http://forum.f-106deltadart.com/thread/4662/35-troubles