Väitätkö, että osaat lukea jos-lauseita?exPertti kirjoitti:Väitätkö, että ne haastattelivat ketään muuta kuin Jungneria silloin? Ja paskat.Toimistorotta kirjoitti:Jungneria ei olisi kutsuttu edes haastatteluun.
Päivän uutiskatsaus
-
Toimistorotta
-
Toimistorotta
Luin. Lauseen voi tajuta niin, että haastatteluun olisi kutsuttu muitakin. Tai että joku haastattelu tai vastaava pelletilaisuus kumileimasimeksi olisi edes pidetty.Toimistorotta kirjoitti:Jos Ylen johtoa olisi valittu aiemmin ei-poliittisin perustein, Jungneria ei olisi kutsuttu edes haastatteluun.
Came here for school, graduated to the high life
-
Toimistorotta
Virkkeen voi tajuta vain niin, että jos kyseessä olisi ollut normaali ei-poliittinen haku, jossa haetaan pätevintä ja sopivinta ihmistä, Jungeria ei olisi edes kutsuttu haastatteluun. Siinä ei oteta mitään kantaa siihen miten haussa on tosiasiallisesti menetelty, saati esitetty väitettä, että ketään olisi haastateltu.exPertti kirjoitti:Luin. Lauseen voi tajuta niin, että haastatteluun olisi kutsuttu muitakin. Tai että joku haastattelu tai vastaava pelletilaisuus kumileimasimeksi olisi edes pidetty.Toimistorotta kirjoitti:Jos Ylen johtoa olisi valittu aiemmin ei-poliittisin perustein, Jungneria ei olisi kutsuttu edes haastatteluun.
^ Sovitaan, että olet väärässä. 
En sinällään ollut kritiikkiäsi vastaan, päinvastoin ja koetin mielestäni vain vielä kärjistää sitä. Kai nuo nimitykset on jossakin Lipposkan työhuoneessa on sovittu.
Jos vaikka sitten Hyssykän nimitykset jossakin muussa vastaavassa paikassa.
En sinällään ollut kritiikkiäsi vastaan, päinvastoin ja koetin mielestäni vain vielä kärjistää sitä. Kai nuo nimitykset on jossakin Lipposkan työhuoneessa on sovittu.
Jos vaikka sitten Hyssykän nimitykset jossakin muussa vastaavassa paikassa.
Came here for school, graduated to the high life
Vihreä ohjelma ei sisälläkään uutta Lannoitusohjelmaa? Onneksi jäi moni muukin aloite hyväksymättä koska eihän sitä koskaan tiedä milloin tapaa Poliisin vanhoja tuttuja?
Pyyhin Netikettiin..
-
Teraslilja_m
- Kitisijä
- Viestit: 1177
- Liittynyt: 30.10.2005 15:31
- Paikkakunta: Helsinki
- Viesti:
-
Ylermi Ylihankala
- Kitisijä
- Viestit: 9426
- Liittynyt: 22.09.2008 13:03
http://www.pokerisivut.com/news/kaikkie ... dessa.html
Tässä ON tyyliä. Kun hävitään, hävitään kunnolla.
Tässä ON tyyliä. Kun hävitään, hävitään kunnolla.
Yliuuttunut ja liian pieni hurmossetä.
-
Bhven
Rahat pois tyhmiltä, vai miten Janne sanoisi.Ylermi Ylihankala kirjoitti:http://www.pokerisivut.com/news/kaikkie ... dessa.html
Tässä ON tyyliä. Kun hävitään, hävitään kunnolla.
Näin naapurissa?Bhven kirjoitti:Rahat pois tyhmiltä, vai miten Janne sanoisi.Ylermi Ylihankala kirjoitti:http://www.pokerisivut.com/news/kaikkie ... dessa.html
Tässä ON tyyliä. Kun hävitään, hävitään kunnolla.
Hiljentykäämme!
aika jätti
Pyyhin Netikettiin..
-
Teraslilja_m
- Kitisijä
- Viestit: 1177
- Liittynyt: 30.10.2005 15:31
- Paikkakunta: Helsinki
- Viesti:
Minun molemmat muksut (tyttö ja poika) harrastavat painia. Pitäisiköhän laittaa vielä harrastamaan nyrkkeilyäkin 
Why it's not always bad to be bullied: Learning to fight back helps children mature, says study
Why it's not always bad to be bullied: Learning to fight back helps children mature, says study
David Derbyshire, 10:01 AM on 24th May 2010, Mail Online kirjoitti:It is considered one of the most stressful experiences of childhood.
But standing up to bullies and classroom enemies can help children develop, psychologists claim.
Although the researchers accept that bullying can be damaging to children, leading to depression and anxiety, those who are not afraid to stand up for themselves can benefit from being picked on.
Boys who stood up to bullies and schoolyard enemies were judged more socially competent by their teachers.
Girls who did the same were more popular and more admired by teachers and peers, the researchers found.
Life is complex, it has real and imaginary parts.
-
Bhven
Globaalin köyhyyden ruma salaisuus
Lasten tulevaisuus näyttäisi aivan erilaiselta jos köyhimmät perheet käyttäisivät yhtä paljon rahaa lastensa kouluttamiseen, kuin alkoholiin, tupakkaan ja prostituutioon.
Nicholas D. Kristof/The New York Times
Jude Kokolo has been stuck in first grade for the last five years because his father says he can’t afford to pay $2.50 a month in school fees. But his father says that he averages $2 a day on alcohol and cigarettes.
There’s an ugly secret of global poverty, one rarely acknowledged by aid groups or U.N. reports. It’s a blunt truth that is politically incorrect, heartbreaking, frustrating and ubiquitous:
It’s that if the poorest families spent as much money educating their children as they do on wine, cigarettes and prostitutes, their children’s prospects would be transformed. Much suffering is caused not only by low incomes, but also by shortsighted private spending decisions by heads of households.
That probably sounds sanctimonious, haughty and callous, but it’s been on my mind while traveling through central Africa with a college student on my annual win-a-trip journey. Here in this Congolese village of Mont-Belo, we met a bright fourth grader, Jovali Obamza, who is about to be expelled from school because his family is three months behind in paying fees. (In theory, public school is free in the Congo Republic. In fact, every single school we visited charges fees.)
We asked to see Jovali’s parents. The dad, Georges Obamza, who weaves straw stools that he sells for $1 each, is unmistakably very poor. He said that the family is eight months behind on its $6-a-month rent and is in danger of being evicted, with nowhere to go.
The Obamzas have no mosquito net, even though they have already lost two of their eight children to malaria. They say they just can’t afford the $6 cost of a net. Nor can they afford the $2.50-a-month tuition for each of their three school-age kids.
“It’s hard to get the money to send the kids to school,” Mr. Obamza explained, a bit embarrassed.
But Mr. Obamza and his wife, Valerie, do have cellphones and say they spend a combined $10 a month on call time.
In addition, Mr. Obamza goes drinking several times a week at a village bar, spending about $1 an evening on moonshine. By his calculation, that adds up to about $12 a month — almost as much as the family rent and school fees combined.
I asked Mr. Obamza why he prioritizes alcohol over educating his kids. He looked pained.
Other villagers said that Mr. Obamza drinks less than the average man in the village (women drink far less). Many other men drink every evening, they said, and also spend money on cigarettes.
“If possible, I drink every day,” Fulbert Mfouna, a 43-year-old whose children have also had to drop out or repeat grades for lack of school fees, said forthrightly. His eldest son, Jude, is still in first grade after repeating for five years because of nonpayment of fees. Meanwhile, Mr. Mfouna acknowledged spending $2 a day on alcohol and cigarettes.
Traditionally, a young man here might have paid his wife’s family a “bride price” of a pair of goats. Now the “bride price” starts with oversized jugs of wine and two bottles of whiskey.
Two M.I.T. economists, Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo, found that the world’s poor typically spend about 2 percent of their income educating their children, and often larger percentages on alcohol and tobacco: 4 percent in rural Papua New Guinea, 6 percent in Indonesia, 8 percent in Mexico. The indigent also spend significant sums on soft drinks, prostitution and extravagant festivals.
Look, I don’t want to be an unctuous party-pooper. But I’ve seen too many children dying of malaria for want of a bed net that the father tells me is unaffordable, even as he spends larger sums on liquor. If we want Mr. Obamza’s children to get an education and sleep under a bed net — well, the simplest option is for their dad to spend fewer evenings in the bar.
Because there’s mounting evidence that mothers are more likely than fathers to spend money educating their kids, one solution is to give women more control over purse strings and more legal title to assets. Some aid groups and U.N. agencies are working on that.
Another approach is microsavings, helping poor people save money when banks aren’t interested in them. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the most powerful part of microfinance isn’t microlending but microsavings.
Microsavings programs, organized by CARE and other organizations, work to turn a consumption culture into a savings culture. The programs often keep household savings in the women’s names, to give mothers more say in spending decisions, and I’ve seen them work in Africa, Latin America and Asia.
Well-meaning humanitarians sometimes burnish suffering to make it seem more virtuous and noble than it often is. If we’re going to make more progress, and get kids like the Obamza children in school and under bed nets, we need to look unflinchingly at uncomfortable truths — and then try to redirect the family money now spent on wine and prostitution.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/opini ... of.html?hp
Lasten tulevaisuus näyttäisi aivan erilaiselta jos köyhimmät perheet käyttäisivät yhtä paljon rahaa lastensa kouluttamiseen, kuin alkoholiin, tupakkaan ja prostituutioon.
Nicholas D. Kristof/The New York Times
Jude Kokolo has been stuck in first grade for the last five years because his father says he can’t afford to pay $2.50 a month in school fees. But his father says that he averages $2 a day on alcohol and cigarettes.
There’s an ugly secret of global poverty, one rarely acknowledged by aid groups or U.N. reports. It’s a blunt truth that is politically incorrect, heartbreaking, frustrating and ubiquitous:
It’s that if the poorest families spent as much money educating their children as they do on wine, cigarettes and prostitutes, their children’s prospects would be transformed. Much suffering is caused not only by low incomes, but also by shortsighted private spending decisions by heads of households.
That probably sounds sanctimonious, haughty and callous, but it’s been on my mind while traveling through central Africa with a college student on my annual win-a-trip journey. Here in this Congolese village of Mont-Belo, we met a bright fourth grader, Jovali Obamza, who is about to be expelled from school because his family is three months behind in paying fees. (In theory, public school is free in the Congo Republic. In fact, every single school we visited charges fees.)
We asked to see Jovali’s parents. The dad, Georges Obamza, who weaves straw stools that he sells for $1 each, is unmistakably very poor. He said that the family is eight months behind on its $6-a-month rent and is in danger of being evicted, with nowhere to go.
The Obamzas have no mosquito net, even though they have already lost two of their eight children to malaria. They say they just can’t afford the $6 cost of a net. Nor can they afford the $2.50-a-month tuition for each of their three school-age kids.
“It’s hard to get the money to send the kids to school,” Mr. Obamza explained, a bit embarrassed.
But Mr. Obamza and his wife, Valerie, do have cellphones and say they spend a combined $10 a month on call time.
In addition, Mr. Obamza goes drinking several times a week at a village bar, spending about $1 an evening on moonshine. By his calculation, that adds up to about $12 a month — almost as much as the family rent and school fees combined.
I asked Mr. Obamza why he prioritizes alcohol over educating his kids. He looked pained.
Other villagers said that Mr. Obamza drinks less than the average man in the village (women drink far less). Many other men drink every evening, they said, and also spend money on cigarettes.
“If possible, I drink every day,” Fulbert Mfouna, a 43-year-old whose children have also had to drop out or repeat grades for lack of school fees, said forthrightly. His eldest son, Jude, is still in first grade after repeating for five years because of nonpayment of fees. Meanwhile, Mr. Mfouna acknowledged spending $2 a day on alcohol and cigarettes.
Traditionally, a young man here might have paid his wife’s family a “bride price” of a pair of goats. Now the “bride price” starts with oversized jugs of wine and two bottles of whiskey.
Two M.I.T. economists, Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo, found that the world’s poor typically spend about 2 percent of their income educating their children, and often larger percentages on alcohol and tobacco: 4 percent in rural Papua New Guinea, 6 percent in Indonesia, 8 percent in Mexico. The indigent also spend significant sums on soft drinks, prostitution and extravagant festivals.
Look, I don’t want to be an unctuous party-pooper. But I’ve seen too many children dying of malaria for want of a bed net that the father tells me is unaffordable, even as he spends larger sums on liquor. If we want Mr. Obamza’s children to get an education and sleep under a bed net — well, the simplest option is for their dad to spend fewer evenings in the bar.
Because there’s mounting evidence that mothers are more likely than fathers to spend money educating their kids, one solution is to give women more control over purse strings and more legal title to assets. Some aid groups and U.N. agencies are working on that.
Another approach is microsavings, helping poor people save money when banks aren’t interested in them. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the most powerful part of microfinance isn’t microlending but microsavings.
Microsavings programs, organized by CARE and other organizations, work to turn a consumption culture into a savings culture. The programs often keep household savings in the women’s names, to give mothers more say in spending decisions, and I’ve seen them work in Africa, Latin America and Asia.
Well-meaning humanitarians sometimes burnish suffering to make it seem more virtuous and noble than it often is. If we’re going to make more progress, and get kids like the Obamza children in school and under bed nets, we need to look unflinchingly at uncomfortable truths — and then try to redirect the family money now spent on wine and prostitution.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/opini ... of.html?hp
^ Ihan mielenkiintoinen näkökulma ja monissa tapauksissa myös uskottava. Ihan jos kattoo jo sossun perusasiakasta. Vois olla kiinnostavaa nähä tilasto miten rahankäytön määrä ja kohteet jakautuu.
Ainakin äkkiseltään tulee mieleen parikin ihmistä:
yksi valittaa ettei oo rahaa asumiseen ja ruokaan, mutta asuu silti keskivertoa kalliimmassa asunnossa ja ostaa leffoja, pelejä ja uusimmat pelikoneet.
Toinen jättää valittaa ettei voi käydä kaupassa kun ei ole rahaa tai maksaa velkojaan muille. Kumminkin on rahaa juoda baarissa monena iltana viikossa. Sama ihminen surkuttelee ettei ole varaa tehdä mitään (esim. ostaa koulukirjoja), mutta lähtee alpeille laskettelemaan pariksi viikoksi, muutaman kuukauden päästä siitä etelään toiseksi mokomaksi.
Kolmas valittaa akuuttia rahanpuutetta, kuinka ei ole rahaa syödä loppukuusta. Alkukuussa tosin syödäänkin sitten pihvejä.
Ainakin äkkiseltään tulee mieleen parikin ihmistä:
yksi valittaa ettei oo rahaa asumiseen ja ruokaan, mutta asuu silti keskivertoa kalliimmassa asunnossa ja ostaa leffoja, pelejä ja uusimmat pelikoneet.
Toinen jättää valittaa ettei voi käydä kaupassa kun ei ole rahaa tai maksaa velkojaan muille. Kumminkin on rahaa juoda baarissa monena iltana viikossa. Sama ihminen surkuttelee ettei ole varaa tehdä mitään (esim. ostaa koulukirjoja), mutta lähtee alpeille laskettelemaan pariksi viikoksi, muutaman kuukauden päästä siitä etelään toiseksi mokomaksi.
Kolmas valittaa akuuttia rahanpuutetta, kuinka ei ole rahaa syödä loppukuusta. Alkukuussa tosin syödäänkin sitten pihvejä.
Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni!
-
Teraslilja_m
- Kitisijä
- Viestit: 1177
- Liittynyt: 30.10.2005 15:31
- Paikkakunta: Helsinki
- Viesti:
Lord Monckton wins global warming debate at Oxford Union
Watts Up With That? kirjoitti:Founded in 1823 at the University of Oxford, but maintaining a separate charter from the University, The Oxford Union is host to some of the most skillful debates in the world. Many eminent scholars and personalities have come and either debated or delivered speeches in the chamber.
Oxford Union Debate on Climate Catastrophe kirjoitti:For what is believed to be the first time ever in England, an audience of university undergraduates has decisively rejected the notion that “global warming” is or could become a global crisis.
Serious observers are interpreting this shock result as a sign that students are now impatiently rejecting the relentless extremist propaganda taught under the guise of compulsory environmental-studies classes in British schools, confirming opinion-poll findings that the voters are no longer frightened by “global warming” scare stories, if they ever were.
Life is complex, it has real and imaginary parts.
-
RP
http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2010052 ... 6_uu.shtml
Mitä vittua? Miksi vitussa? Hyi vittu sentään.
Mitä vittua? Miksi vitussa? Hyi vittu sentään.
Simppeliä. Kun näitä propellipäitä tuodaan anarkistisista maista ei heillä ole mitään kunnioitusta ihmishenkeä kohtaan. Sitä ei yksi tai kaksi sossutätiä korjaa.RP kirjoitti:http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2010052 ... 6_uu.shtml
Mitä vittua? Miksi vitussa? Hyi vittu sentään.
Came here for school, graduated to the high life
-
NuoriD
Erittäin kummallinen uutinen.RP kirjoitti:http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2010052 ... 6_uu.shtml
Mitä vittua? Miksi vitussa? Hyi vittu sentään.
-
Ylermi Ylihankala
- Kitisijä
- Viestit: 9426
- Liittynyt: 22.09.2008 13:03
Tulis mieleen velanperintä, uhkailu yms.NuoriD kirjoitti:Erittäin kummallinen uutinen.RP kirjoitti:http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2010052 ... 6_uu.shtml
Mitä vittua? Miksi vitussa? Hyi vittu sentään.
Yliuuttunut ja liian pieni hurmossetä.
-
NuoriD
Olisiko tytön vanhemmilla jotain hämäryyksiä joo...Ylermi Ylihankala kirjoitti:Tulis mieleen velanperintä, uhkailu yms.NuoriD kirjoitti:Erittäin kummallinen uutinen.RP kirjoitti:http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2010052 ... 6_uu.shtml
Mitä vittua? Miksi vitussa? Hyi vittu sentään.
-
Ylermi Ylihankala
- Kitisijä
- Viestit: 9426
- Liittynyt: 22.09.2008 13:03